arrow_back edit

What Happens If We Get Rejected for Every Grant We Apply For?

The Recovery Roadmap

Getting rejected for grants feels personal. After pouring hours into applications, crafting compelling narratives, and imagining the impact your project could have, that polite "thank you for your application, but..." email hits like a punch to the gut.

If you're facing a string of rejections, you're not alone. Even experienced charities go through dry spells. The question isn't whether you'll face rejection - it's how you'll respond when it happens.

Let's talk honestly about grant rejection, why it happens more often than you think, and most importantly, how to turn those "no" responses into future "yes" decisions.

The Reality Check: Rejection Rates Are Higher Than You Think

Before we dive into solutions, let's establish some uncomfortable truths about grant success rates:

Industry Average Success Rates:

• New applicants to major trusts: 10-15%
• Established relationships with funders: 25-40%
• Small local grants: 40-60%
• Government grants: 5-20% (highly variable)
• First-time applicants to any funder: 8-12%

This means that rejection is the norm, not the exception. If you're getting rejected for 80-90% of your applications, you're actually performing at industry average.

Why Good Projects Get Rejected (It's Not Always About You)

Funder-Side Reasons (60% of rejections):

• Limited funding available vs. high demand
• Strategic priorities shifted since guidelines published
• Geographic restrictions you didn't fully understand
• Timing issues (end of funding cycle, budget already allocated)
• Internal politics or board preferences

Application-Side Reasons (40% of rejections):

• Poor funder-project alignment
• Unclear project outcomes or methodology
• Unrealistic budgets or timelines
• Weak evidence of organizational capability
• Missing key information or requirements

The Hard Truth: Sometimes excellent projects get rejected simply because 200 other excellent projects applied for the same pot of money.

The Immediate Response: What to Do in the First 48 Hours

Step 1: Feel the Disappointment (But Set a Time Limit) Give yourself permission to be frustrated for 24-48 hours. Rejection hurts, especially when you've invested significant time and emotional energy.

Step 2: Request Feedback Immediately Send a polite email within 48 hours:

"Thank you for considering our application. To help us improve future submissions, would you be able to provide brief feedback on why our application was unsuccessful? Any insights would be greatly appreciated."

Response rates for feedback requests: About 30% of funders will provide some level of feedback if asked promptly and politely.

Step 3: Document Everything Create a rejection log including:

• Funder name and program
• Amount requested
• Rejection reason (if provided)
• Your assessment of what went wrong
• Lessons learned for next time

The Analysis Phase: Learning from Rejection Patterns

If You're Getting Rejected at the Eligibility Stage:

• You're applying to poorly matched funders
• Solution: Improve your funder research process
• Time investment: Focus more time on research, less on writing

If You're Getting Rejected After Full Review:

• Your applications are reaching decision-makers but are losing in the competition
• Solution: Strengthen your case for impact and organisational credibility
• Time investment: Focus on evidence gathering and relationship building

If You're Getting Generic Rejection Letters:

• High competition or your application had fundamental issues
• Solution: Request specific feedback and consider professional review
• Time investment: May need external perspective on your approach

The Strategic Pivot: Adjusting Your Approach

After 3-5 Rejections from Similar Funders: Your approach needs fundamental changes, not minor tweaks.

Potential Pivots:

• Project scope: Maybe your project is too ambitious or too small for your target funders
• Funder tier: You might be aiming too high or too low for your organisation's profile
• Geographic focus: Local funders might be more receptive than national ones (or vice versa)
• Timing: Your project might be ahead of or behind current funding trends

After 10+ Rejections Overall: Consider whether grant funding is the right strategy for this particular project.

Alternative Funding Strategies:

• Corporate partnerships and sponsorship
• Individual donor campaigns
• Fee-for-service revenue models
• Crowdfunding for smaller amounts
• Social investment or loans

Turning Rejection into Relationship Building

The Follow-Up Strategy That Actually Works:

Month 1: Send thank you note with feedback request
Month 6: Share a brief update on your project progress (even if unfunded)
Month 12: Inform them about project outcomes or new developments
Next funding cycle: Apply again with an improved application

Sample Follow-Up Email (6 months later):
"Following our unsuccessful application last year, I wanted to update you on our project progress. Despite not securing your funding, we've managed to launch a pilot version through {alternative funding source}. Early results show {specific outcome}. We'd welcome the opportunity to discuss our expanded plans when your next funding round opens."

Why This Works: Funders remember organisations that demonstrate resilience and keep them informed. You're building a relationship, not just submitting applications.

The Improvement Roadmap: Getting Better at Grant Applications

Quick Wins (Implement Immediately):

• Create a funder research checklist to improve targeting
• Develop template responses for common application sections
• Set up a system to track and learn from rejections

Medium-Term Improvements (3-6 months):

• Attend funder events and networking opportunities
• Seek feedback from successful applicants in your sector
• Consider grant writing training or professional development

Long-Term Strategy (6-12 months):

• Build relationships with program officers before applying
• Develop partnerships with other organizations for joint applications
• Create a more diverse funding portfolio to reduce grant dependence

When to Consider Professional Help

Hire a Grant Writing Consultant When:

• Your success rate is below 10% after 20+ applications
• You're consistently getting rejected at the same stage
• You lack internal capacity for proper application development
• You're applying for grants over £50,000

Typical consultant success rates: 25-40% (but they're selective about which opportunities they pursue)

Cost-benefit analysis: If consultant fees are less than 10% of potential grant value and they double your success rate, it's usually worthwhile.

The Resilience Factor: Keeping Your Team Motivated

Managing Team Morale During Rejection Streaks:

Celebrate the Process, Not Just Outcomes:

• Acknowledge the effort that went into the applications
• Highlight skills developed through the process
• Recognise improvements in application quality over time

Share the Bigger Picture:

• Remind the team that rejection is normal in grant funding
• Focus on long-term relationship building with funders
• Emphasise learning and improvement over immediate success

Set Realistic Expectations:

• Budget for 10-20% success rates in planning
• Apply to multiple funders for each project
• Have backup funding strategies ready

Questions to Ask After Every Rejection

• Was this funder genuinely aligned with our project?
• Did we provide all requested information clearly?
• How did our application compare to their previous awards?
• What could we have done differently in our approach?
• Should we apply to this funder again in future?
• What did we learn that will improve our next application?

The Success Mindset: Reframing Rejection

Instead of: "We got rejected again"
Think: "We're building relationships and improving our applications"

Instead of: "They don't understand our work"
Think: "We need to communicate our impact more clearly"

Instead of: "Grant funding doesn't work for us"
Think: "We need to refine our strategy and targeting"

Remember: Every successful charity has faced multiple rejections. The difference is they learned from each one and kept improving their approach.

The Bottom Line: Rejection as Data, Not Defeat

Grant rejection isn't a judgment on your organization's worth or your project's value. It's data about funder alignment, application quality, and market timing.

The most successful grant writers:

• Apply to more funders (knowing most will say no)
• Learn something from every rejection
• Build relationships even with funders who reject them
• Continuously improve their applications based on feedback
• Maintain diverse funding strategies beyond grants

Your rejection rate will improve over time if you:

• Target better-aligned funders
• Strengthen your applications based on feedback
• Build relationships with program officers
• Develop templates and systems for efficiency
• Learn from both rejections and successes

The goal isn't to avoid rejection - it's to get rejected faster and learn quicker, so you can find the funders who are genuinely excited to support your work.

Every "no" gets you closer to the "yes" that will fund your project and create the impact your community needs.